Discussion about this post

User's avatar
L. M. Sacasas's avatar

I tried to make clear in the essay with reference to the three classes of agents we encounter, that the blame, such as it is, lay chiefly with the system that demanded conformity rather than the person who labored within it, but there’s a further point, which I failed to make.

The most important imperative is the one I give myself. I must actively resist conformity to depersonalizing patterns in these situations for the sake of the other even as I may desire that they do so for my sake. And perhaps it is even the case that the greater responsibility lies with me, less entangled as I was in the particular context I described.

Expand full comment
Eric Dane Walker's avatar

This latest installment struck me as cutting particularly deep. Very nice.

"What these institutions have chiefly taught us, Illich argued, is that we are, in ourselves, inadequate to the task of living together as human beings in the world. That we cannot get on without the products and services that they alone can supply. Such institutions are not interested in equipping or empowering us, only in confirming us in an indefinite state of dependence in a consumerist mode. The professions associated with such institutions Illich called 'disabling professions'."

Forgive my playing the broken record: I'd like to reiterate that John McKnight's book, The Careless Society: Community and Its Counterfeits, contains concrete, documented cases that manifest the pattern you and Illich have trained your eyes on. (It's no coincidence: McKnight wrote the book after being interviewed by David Cayley for the latter's radio program, Ideas. Cayley emphasized to McKnight the relevance of Illich.) The cases explained in McKnight's book not only supply an articulation of the pattern, spelling out its meaning in concrete contexts, but confirm the existence of the pattern as well. You're not peddling hypotheses that merely "seem plausible."

McKnight describes the pattern — or, perhaps, one aspect of the pattern — in terms of "professionalization": the transformation of The Citizen, who contributes his gifts in a convivial community, into The Client, who is in perpetual, passive need of ministration from The Professional, who always knows better because he is credentialed and outfitted with "techniques" for producing The Product that The Client needs.

I mention this in case you ever write a book or are confronted with a more skeptical audience. And in case any of your readers might be interested.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts